Wednesday 27 February 2013

Organic Agriculture not GMOs remain key for Uganda’s Competitiveness



The Parliamentary Committee on Science and Technology is currently conducting public consultations on Bio-safety and Biotechnology bill 2012 and is expected to report back to the House in 48 days. The bill is contentious because, in current form, it will pave way for mass introduction of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) in Uganda – under the pretext of saving Uganda from food insecurity!  To put it into bluntly, with the passing and implementation of this bill, those who enjoy local chicken and other traditional African dishes will soon forget them. With terminator seeds in place, farmers will lose seed sovereignty- they will no longer keep seed in their granaries for next season- they will be conditioned to buy from multinational seed companies and their auxiliaries in Uganda. Farmers will in effect be consigned clients of these companies with no control or decision on seed price, quality etc. So, will Parliament enact this bill into law? We wait and see. The other big question is- Should Uganda promote Organic agriculture or go GMOs? From livelihoods and economic point of view, Uganda clearly has a comparative and competitive advantage in organic agriculture. I have held several conversations with biotechnology activists like Dr. Arthur Makara and Peter Wamboga of Science Foundation for Development (SCIFODE) who continue to tenaciously argue that humans have used the biological processes of microorganisms since 6000 years ago to make useful food products, such as bread and cheese and to preserve dairy products. They argue that GMOs are the future. It now seems most scientists, economists and some legislators have bought into this GMOs narrative. Environmentalists, conservation agriculture promoters and green advocates seem to be losing ground in Uganda. This will certainly have consequences in a near future.  Whatever the benefits of GMO’s and the rosy spinning about it, I strongly believe organic food production remains Uganda’s strategic flagship and roll coaster sub sector that will deliver Ugandan farmers  and economy to sustainable prosperity.
You see, organic agriculture means growing of crops without use of conventional pesticides, artificial fertilizers and other off farm inputs. For animals, it means they are reared without the routine use of antibiotics and use of hormones. The tools and practices of organic agriculture include traditional alternatives like crop rotation, manuring and liming.
Organic farming enhances soil structures, conserves water and ensures the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.
Cartels of studies indicate that demand for Uganda’s organic products has been growing considerably over the years. For example, in 20011/2012, export of organic agricultural products were estimated to be in a range of US$28.4 million having risen from US$ 6.2 million 2004/05. The organic agricultural sub sector is growing at a rate of 38% per annum. Uganda is presently estimated to have 200,000 certified organic agricultural farmers and an estimated 185,000 hectares of land certified for organic farming. The range of products being exported include fresh vegetables, fresh tropical fruits, dried fruits, coffee, tea, cotton, sesame, spices, honey and other forest products. Major market destinations for Uganda’s organic agricultural products include the United States, Germany and the United Kingdom. The UNEP-UNCTAD report revealed that an average pineapple worth perhaps 200 Ugandan shillings (about 8 cents U.S.) in a local market can fetch 600 from an exporter who will package it and ship it to Europe.
Uganda retains a strategic comparative advantage due to her conducive weather conditions that support organic agriculture allowing increased production without resorting to non-agriculture inputs. It is worth noting that Uganda currently has the lowest agro-chemical usage in Africa estimated at less than 2% compared to an average of 5% for East Africa. Therefore, a robust organic agricultural sub – sector would increase income opportunity for the poor, stabilize the environment and increase export earnings.

Uganda needs to strengthen organic production potential through supportive macro and micro economic policies, adequate budget allocation, favorable tax regimes and farmer education. Standardization and certification lie at the heart of organic production and marketing. Organic products cannot sell in international market like the U.S, Europe and Japan unless they adhere to clearly set standards of quality and quantity requirements. Indeed over 85% of farmers in Uganda practice defacto organic production without certification. This means that they cannot easily sell in international markets. Uganda also has only one recognized certification body – Ugocert, which is not enough to certify the majority of farmers who practice defacto organic production.

We know that organic farming isn’t easy. Producing certified crops takes patience and much proper training in the effective use of organic techniques to battle familiar farming challenges like pests and soil degradation but future growth and opportunities are convincing in form of - in form of a wide export market. For example Data from International Trade Centre shows that organic agriculture markets are currently at US$46 billion in Europe, US$ 45 billion in the United States and US$ 11 billion in Japan. While much of that product demand originates in wealthy developed nations, it creates opportunity for Uganda to build a sustainable export business that protects natural resources while boosting the economy through the creation of long-term green jobs.  Government of Uganda and all actors in the agricultural sector should rush to provide solutions to specific constraints to organic production and market access to the growing local and international market, particularly through standardization and certification. Uganda must position its self to reap from these surging opportunities. In the current form, this bill will hamstring Uganda’s competitiveness and kill jobs.
Morrison Rwakakamba
Chief Executive Officer
Agency for Transformation

Friday 15 February 2013

Why Think Tanks are key to transforming Uganda to First World


Few months ago Uganda launched 2040 Vision. The document is imaginative but weak on benchmark drivers to achieving an integrated first world economy by 2040. For example, the role of knowledge is not clearly articulated. In all developed nations on earth, Think tanks are bedrocks of knowledge agenda.  You see, these Think tanks are public-policy research analysis and engagement organizations that generate policy oriented research, analysis, and advice on domestic and international issues, which enable policymakers and the public to make informed decisions about public policy issues. Such Think tanks may be affiliated or independent institutions and are structured as permanent bodies, not ad hoc commissions. These institutions often act as a bridge between the academic and policy-making communities and between states and civil society, serving in the public interest as independent voices that translate applied and basic research into a language and form that is understandable, reliable, and accessible for policymakers and the public.

James McGann (2012), argues that the potential of think tanks to support and sustain democratic governments and civil society is far from exhausted. Today policymakers and civil society throughout the developed and the developing world face the common problem of bringing expert knowledge to bear on government decision-making. The challenge is to harness the vast reservoir of knowledge, information and associational energy that exists in public policy research organizations in every region of the world for public good – You see; McGann makes an important point because knowledge is increasingly an international commodity that spans physical and metaphysical boundaries. Indeed learning and knowledge are the key ingredients that hydrate the process of transformation. Recently, key ideas that shaped the 2012 campaigns in United States were cooked in strategy rooms of major Think tanks like Brookings Institution and Center for American Progress. In Uganda, we seem to be playing a catch up game. The 2012 Global Go-To Think Tank Index shows that progress is happening in Uganda. For example, the Economic Policy Research Center (EPRC) was ranked the best Think tank in Uganda, followed by Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment (ACODE), and Makerere Institute of Social Research (MISR) respectively.  ACODE was further ranked 25th among the top 50 Think Tanks in Africa. MISR was further ranked 37th among the top 50 think tanks in Africa. And out of the 75 Think Tanks with the Best Advocacy Campaign, ACODE was ranked 38th and MISR 69th. ACODE was also ranked 17th globally among the top Think Tanks with the Best Policy Report Produced during 2011-2012. Perhaps, what we need to interrogate is whether government institutions and wider public are piggybacking information and knowledge from these think tanks to strengthen public policy and service delivery in Uganda. Quite often, these think tanks face a dilemma in of demonstrating ability for brutal independence. In many countries, phantom Think Tanks are mushrooming, where  governments create think tanks that are designed to appear to be non-governmental organizations but are in fact arms of the government. Likewise, opposition parties, corporations and individuals have established think tanks to promote their special and particularistic interests. This trend raises concerns about a lack of transparency and private interest masquerading as public interest. Are Think tanks in Uganda ready to overcome this temptation?  

The other challenge for think tanks is to produce timely and accessible policy-oriented research that effectively engages policymakers, the press and the public on the critical issues facing a country. Gone are the days when a think tank could operate with the motto “research it, write it and they will find it.” Today, think tanks must be lean, mean, policy machines. The Economist described “good think tanks” as those organizations that are able to combine “intellectual depth, political influence, and flair for publicity, comfortable surroundings, and a streak of eccentricity.” Uganda- we still have a lot to learn along this transformation journey.

Morrison Rwakakamba
Chief Executive Officer
Agency for Transformation